Does the company control or have the right to control what the worker does and how the worker does his or her job?
Are the business aspects of the worker’s job controlled by the employer? Some of the factors to examine are the following:
- How worker is paid
- Whether expenses are reimbursed
- Who provides tools/supplies, etc.
Type of Relationship
Are there written contracts or employee type benefits (i.e. pension plan, insurance, vacation pay, etc.)?
Will the relationship continue and is the work performed a key aspect of the business?
Weighing the Factors
Businesses must weigh all these factors when determining whether a worker is an employee or independent contractor. Some factors may indicate that the worker is an employee, while other factors indicate that the worker is an independent contractor.
No One Factor is Determinative and Each Situation is Unique
There is no magic here. However, the following guidelines appear to be universal in all situations:
There are no set number of factors that makes the worker an employee or an independent contractor.
No one factor stands alone in making this determination.
Factors which are relevant in one situation may not be relevant in another.
Keys To Determination
The keys are to look at the entire relationship, consider the degree or extent of the right to direct and control, and finally, to document each of the factors used in coming up with the determination.
IRS Revenue Ruling 87-41 Provides 20 Factors To Determining Employee Status Under Common Law
This IRS Revenue Ruling 87-41 provides 20 factors to help determine whether sufficient control is present to establish an employer-employee relationship. The 20 factors have been developed based on an examination of cases and rulings considering whether an individual is an employee. Some basic considerations from this pronouncement are as follows:
- The degree of importance of each factor varies depending on the occupation and the factual context in which services are performed.
- The 20 factors are not to be applied blindly. Rather, they are to be used as an aid in applying the common law.
- Although a variety of factors may be used to analyze employment status for tax purposed, the regulations provide that employer control over the manner in which the work is performed is probably the most important.
- The test is not the actual control by the employer but the employer's right to control.
For a complete listing and discussion of these 20 factors please see Employee Status Under Common Law: Rev. Ruling 87-41: 20 Factors
IRS Form SS-8
This form allows a taxpayer to submit their particular factual situation to the IRS for a determination of the employee/independent contractor status. A ruling usually takes about 6 months. It is also helpful and instructive to review this Form SS-8 since it lays out many detailed factors that the IRS looks to if you were to request a ruling from them on this issue.
Please understand that the above is merely an overview of the issues involved in this complex area. The correct determination of this worker classification issue for an employer will depend upon an analysis of their unique and particular factual situation. Please do not hesitate to contact our office if you have any questions or need our assistance.
Copyright © 2010,2013 - Steven J. Fromm & Associates, P.C., 1420 Walnut Street, Suite 300, Philadelphia, PA 19102. All rights reserved.
If and only to the extent that this publication contains contributions from tax professionals who are subject to the rules of professional conduct set forth in Circular 230, as promulgated by the United States Department of the Treasury, the publisher, on behalf of those contributors, hereby states that any U.S. federal tax advice that is contained in such contributions was not intended or written to be used by any taxpayer for the purpose of avoiding penalties that may be imposed on the taxpayer by the Internal Revenue Service, and it cannot be used by any taxpayer for such purpose.
Fred Marshall, February 27, 2009: “Steve is an excellent corporate attorney who has a deep understanding of corporate law, taxes and estate planning. He’s been extremely helpful to me in keeping my many companies and business ventures organized, focused and squeaky clean. He’s very strong in estate planning and wealth preservation as well. Finally, his follow through is air tight and utterly dependable. Top Qualities: Personable, Expert, On Time. Retained in 1994 and continuously thereafter.